Abstract

International transfer pricing concerns the prices charged between associated enterprises across national borders. Associated enterprises, also known as related parties, are enterprises that control each other either directly or indirectly by means of capital participation. International transfer pricing decisions have to be made, for instance, when a mother company delivers goods, services or intangibles to its foreign subsidiaries, particularly when it receives them from its affiliates. The tax rates on company profits differ from country to country. In the EU member states the tax rate differential on company profits range between 10 % in Bulgaria to about 35 % in France. Such tax rate differentials encourage associated enterprises to set transfer prices that shift profits from high-tax to low-tax countries in order to reduce the overall tax burden for the whole Multinational Corporation. No country can allow its tax base to suffer because of international transfer pricing. It is therefore necessary to set up guidelines in order to avoid arbitrary pricing. The OECD member countries have agreed that international transfer prices shall be determined according to the “Arm’s Length Principle”. The “Arm’s Length Principle” is an important element of the tax jurisdictions in EU member states. In order to reduce bureaucratic burdens imposed on Multinational Corporations operating on the European Common Market the European Commission has proposed an EU-wide common approach to transfer pricing documentation requirements. This EU Code of Conduct on transfer pricing documentation (EU TPD) shall help to prevent Multinational Corporations with affiliates in different EU Member States from taking a country-by-country documentation approach. This article describes economic implications of international transfer pricing. Furthermore it classifies and compares the possiblities to determine an „arm’s length price“ according to the OECD Guidelines 2010. Based on empirical data concerning the actual taxes on company profits in EU member states the article shows that the EU Code of Conduct on transfer pricing documentation (EU TPD) can only be an intermediate remedy towards an inevitable tax harmonization in the European Union. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.eis.0.5.1085

Highlights

  • The economic backbone of the European Common Market is the innercommunity trade

  • In order to reduce bureaucratic burdens and the compliance costs imposed on Multinational Corporations operating in the European Common Market the European Commission proposes an EU-wide common approach to transfer pricing documentation requirements

  • International transfer pricing refers to the practise of pricing among the subsidiaries and affiliates of the same corporate family located in different countries

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The economic backbone of the European Common Market is the innercommunity trade. More than 60 % of German foreign trade is with EU member states. Compliance costs are the costs of a taxpaying corporation for the documentation of information and data requested by tax authorities in different member states.[4] In order to reduce bureaucratic burdens and the compliance costs imposed on Multinational Corporations operating in the European Common Market the European Commission proposes an EU-wide common approach to transfer pricing documentation requirements. This EU Code of Conduct on transfer pricing documentation (EU TPD) shall help to prevent Multinational Corporations with affiliates in different EU Member States to take a country-by-country documentation approach. That’s why it is called “market-based pricing”

Transfer Pricing
Determining a Transfer Price
Implementation Problems
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call