Abstract

Paris agreement, despite its many aspects and mixture of hard, soft, and non-obligations that are distinct and contain importance and vitality, however, they are not fully clarified in terms of their boundaries. There are various discussions and debates upon the agreements’ success or failure. Additionally, drives behind political parties, further motivation for more compliance with the agreement and to encourage major actors for higher response levels against climate change as it is “the most difficult and complex collective action problem of the world”. In this article, challenges to the agreement are noted and possible approaches towards a better future for application and compliance with the agreement are presented. For this purpose, categories of law are looked into in regard to Paris agreement and a number of aspects are highlighted. The interrelation link that exist among these obligations regardless of their forms is explored through the context of Paris agreement and its critical importance is emphasized. Our doctrine approach compares and investigates most recent and relevant studies upon the matter at hand and endeavors to create a better understanding on the importance of Paris agreement

Highlights

  • The topic of climate change has been a widely recognized matter and this recognition has been increasing. The significance of this issue led to an international agreement regarding climate change in Paris Agreement that was supported by a considerable amount of authorities and various parties

  • It was stated by the secretary general of the United Nations (Ban Ki-moon) that this covenant is signed with aims and perspectives of the future

  • Considering the aforementioned notions of this study, it can be seen that the concern is upon the matter of whether or not the Paris Agreement will be able to make a significant progress in terms of achieving its goals on a global scale

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The topic of climate change has been a widely recognized matter and this recognition has been increasing. The Paris Agreement is a mixture of different laws, from hard to soft It has been said- from lead-up to the agreement and since- the mitigation of emissions are non-binding and obligations regard this matter are ‘soft laws’. It is important to note FCCC and Kyoto protocol in regard to their provisions and legal character-that differs within the binding instruments-due to their policies for all countries (both developed and developing) in regard to climate change. They do not legally bind mitigation commitment for developing countries, which is due to their capacity as it was previously mentioned.

Prior Negotiations to the Paris Agreement
Saudi Arabia
Guiding principles
Mulko Asaad Ado a Obligations of all parties
Pledge and Review
Findings
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.