Abstract
Bull’s importance in the academic study of international relations has long been recognized, but precisely where and how his work fits in is more contested. There is no doubt that he is a central figure in what has come to be called the English School of international relations — in terms of both his core focus on the idea of international society and of his view of the appropriate methods by which the subject should be studied.1 His reception in the United States, however, is more complex. Although his work on strategic studies won him very broad acclaim, and his attack on behaviouralism achieved widespread notice, The Anarchical Society and his broader ideas about international society have always fitted somewhat uneasily into the debates and academic categories of US international relations.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.