Abstract

Background: The demand for implementing a new listing scheme to expedite patient access to novel oncology drugs has increased in South Korea. This study was conducted to compare the prices of anticancer drugs between eight countries and to explore the feasibility of a ‘pre-listing and post-evaluation’ scheme to expedite patient access to oncology drugs. Methods: This study included 34 anticancer drugs, which were reimbursed between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2017. The unit price and sales volume of the study drugs were collected from eight countries and IQVIA data, respectively. The prices were adjusted to estimate the ex-factory prices using the discount/rebate rate suggested by the Health Insurance Review Agency (HIRA). The four price indices of Laspeyres, Paasche, Fisher, and the unweighted index were calculated using the price in each country, the average price, and lowest price among the study countries. Each currency was converted using the currency exchange rate and purchasing power parity (PPP). The budget impact of implementing the proposed pre-listing and post-evaluation scheme on payers was calculated. Results: Based on the currency exchange rate, anticancer drug prices were higher in other countries (index range: 1.05–2.78) compared to Korea. The prices in Korea were similar to countries with the lowest prices. When the PPP was applied, prices were higher in the US, Germany, Italy, and Japan than in Korea (range: 1.10–2.13); however, the prices were lower in the UK, France, and Switzerland than in Korea (range: 0.72–0.99). The financial burden of implementing the pre-listing and post-evaluation scheme was calculated at 0.83% of the total anticancer drug sales value in Korea from 2013–2017. Conclusions: The prices of anticancer drugs in Korea were similar to the lowest prices among the seven other study countries. A pre-listing and post-evaluation scheme should be considered to improve patient access to novel anticancer drugs by reducing the reimbursement review time and uncertainties.

Highlights

  • The objectives of this study were to compare the prices of anticancer drugs among 8 countries including Korea based on price indices, which were calculated using currency exchange rates and purchasing power parities (PPPs), to explore the feasibility of the proposed pre-listing and post-evaluation scheme, and to calculate the budget impact on payers if this new reimbursement scheme is implemented in South Korea

  • When the Laspeyres index tween Korea and A7 countries based on the currency exchange rate and PPP

  • The pre-listing and post-evaluation scheme, which is a type of performance-based managed entry agreement or risk-sharing agreement, can play a vital role in improving the accessibility of new drugs

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The economic burden of cancer is significant and increasing globally. In South Korea, the cancer prevalence per 100,000 population has increased by. Cancer-related mortality rates have decreased over the last several decades due to significant advances in the development of novel anticancer drugs [4]. The demand for implementing a new listing scheme to expedite patient access to novel oncology drugs has increased in South Korea. This study was conducted to compare the prices of anticancer drugs between eight countries and to explore the feasibility of a ‘pre-listing and post-evaluation’ scheme to expedite patient access to oncology drugs. The unit price and sales volume of the study drugs were collected from eight countries and IQVIA data, respectively. Results: Based on the currency exchange rate, anticancer drug prices were higher in other countries (index range: 1.05–2.78)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call