Abstract
Since the cold war the deployment of missions that focus on developing peace and the establishment of international criminal tribunals that focus on delivering retributive justice have dominated the international approach to peacebuilding. Referencing the actions of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and the United Nations Mission in Kosovo (UNMIK), and especially the case of Ramush Haradinaj, this article examines how the objectives and actions of these two institutions have adversely affected each other's work. It is important that all international actors follow the same approach in order to achieve a coherent peacebuilding process. The article also explores some of the consequences for international institutions if they are to follow either the peace approach or the justice approach.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
