Abstract

espanolEl numero de sentencia del TJUE en materia de marcas europeas se ha incrementado dramaticamente en los ultimos anos. Si bien la redaccion de los foros de competencia en el Reglamento de marca europea y del Reglamento Bruselas I es similar, su interpretacion varia de manera sustancial. Esta divergente interpretacion afecta a la seguridad juridica de las companias que identifican sus productos y servicios en el mercado interior haciendo uso de marcas nacionales y europeas paralelas; e incrementa la complejidad a la hora de litigar en aquellos casos en los que ambas categorias de derechos de propiedad industrial estan en disputa. Para reducir estos problemas en el presente trabajo se propone la adopcion de una interpretacion uniforme de los foros de competencia del Reglamento de marca europea y del Reglamento Bruselas I. EnglishThe volume of judgments of the CJEU in the field of EU trademarks has increased dramatically in the latest years. While the drafting of the grounds of jurisdiction in the EU Trademark Regulation is quite similar to those of the Brussels I Regulation, their interpretation varies substantially. This divergent interpretation affects legal certainty of companies identifying their products and services in the Internal market using parallel national trademarks and EU trademarks and increases the complexity of litigation in those cases where both categories of industrial property rights are at stake. To reduce these problems, the present work proposes the adoption of a uniform interpretation of the grounds of jurisdiction of the EU trademark Regulation and the Brussels I Regulation.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.