Abstract
Each system component, which is in relation with human social life, is in mutual interaction with its environment and in a constant evolution and change. This uninterrupted move, which always led to the upswing whole system at the end, is implemented in the wake of its components with the requirements of human life. So it can be said that organizational development of international law that one of its achievements is the emergence of international tribunals as an embodiment of the maturity of relations between political units and their collective life, was a value flow and its result was the development of normative system of international law; an effective relationship between the structure and norm-cross in which each other will equip and grow. In this study, a thorough investigation into all aspects and intricacies of this effect is not desired. But only review the corner of the ocean in terms of cause and effect is included developing rules of international law.In spite of the general meaning of "International Judicial Position" in this topic, our focus will be on the position of the Judges at the International court of justice as the main judicial organ of United Nations organization.
Highlights
The emergence of international courts and governments resorting to judicial dispute settlement procedure is one of the manifestations of the development of international relations and the growing acceptance certificate the legal order of international political relations in throughput
In response to why such is claimed it should be noted that the judges in the international courts such as the International Court of Justice properties, firstly able to do that merely by the presence as the international judges at the tribunal and employment status has been granted to them, secondly, the independence and impartiality of judges and the judicial system as a legacy which born at the national legal system and imported into the international legal system is an element which increase the validity of the thoughts and ideas of international judges
The statutes of all judicial tribunals discussed for this issue of a ban on the activities out of the courts; but the degree to which there are differences for such a ban, which in some cases referred to the term "limitations" rather than "Prohibition" is more appropriate. Another manifestation of prejudice international judges that according to documents clearly establish international tribunals violated the principle of impartiality of the judge is previous connection with the parties or the subject filed with the court
Summary
The emergence of international courts and governments resorting to judicial dispute settlement procedure is one of the manifestations of the development of international relations and the growing acceptance certificate the legal order of international political relations in throughput. Employment in the office of international judicial is a precious opportunity for scholars in an effort to develop norms and rules of international law, which is made possible through the structural development of this system. In response to why such is claimed it should be noted that the judges in the international courts such as the International Court of Justice properties, firstly able to do that merely by the presence as the international judges at the tribunal and employment status has been granted to them, secondly, the independence and impartiality of judges and the judicial system as a legacy which born at the national legal system and imported into the international legal system is an element which increase the validity of the thoughts and ideas of international judges
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
