Abstract
The persistence of the debate opposing universality of human rights and relativism explains that many problems met when implementing human rights in a non-Western country are given a reason. has been described for decades as being by sources both outside and within the country. This has contributed to a viewpoint where human rights standards, if not the rule of law itself, are seen as being largely alien to the Japanese system, society and individuals. Therefore, human rights violations are seen as defensible, or at least understandable, or even downright inevitable and enduring.This article tries to propose another approach to culture and human rights in moving from an academic debate regarding the existence of an unique Japan mindset distrustful of the international human rights discourse, to an analysis of the political and social use of this discourse by authorities and social movements in the context of power plays regarding legal and social change. Part I sums up the enduring debate opposing the promoters of relativism and the proponents of the universality of human rights. Special focus will be put on the case of values at a time where the principal advocates of this theory, Southeast Asian countries, have decided to set up the first regional human rights mechanism in that region. The practice of international bodies on the role of culture and implementation of international human rights will be discussed.Part II analyzes the case of Japan. After a short overview of the history of human rights constitutionalism and commitments of regarding international human rights law, we will analyze the meaning of the cultural factor for explaining Japan's human rights record. The nihonjiron literature will be opposed to the actions of social movements using human rights arguments to promote social and legal change. Relevance of culture and traditions will be discussed in relation to human rights litigation and the role of the judiciary body. Our analysis will close with a presentation of a specific social movement - women's groups - and how they have worked during decades to promote social and legal change, notably by referring to international human rights law.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.