Abstract

Those working with pregnant women know the situation well: whether a particular unborn baby is judged to be too small will partly depend on the choice of fetal biometric charts used. Some charts can increase the likelihood of finding a fetal measurement below a threshold for smallness by fourfold or more.1 Inconsistent chart use and overestimation of fetal smallness can result in cynicism, confusion, and anxiety for pregnant women and their caregivers at all stages of pregnancy. The stakes are especially high when smallness of biometric measures alone raises a red flag for aneuploidy, other genetic syndromes such as skeletal dysplasia, or fetal developmental abnormalities such as microcephaly.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.