Abstract

The rapid development of modern self-employment, the massive transition from employment to self-employment and vice versa is a challenge for traditional pension systems. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) responded by adopting compulsory state pension schemes for the self-employed shared with employees. Russia following global trends with a small-time lag, unlike others, provides an unconditional guarantee of social pensions. It is all the more important to study the advanced international experience in attracting the self-employed to pension insurance. This is the aim of the study. Research tasks are as follows: to identify different approaches to organizing pension insurance for the self-employed across OECD countries, to examine the mechanisms and factors arising, and to evaluate their performance. The research method is cluster analysis of the generated self-employed pensions parametric indicators database according to OECD data (2019–2021) (18 indicators as part of clustering, architecture, finance, performance factors) for 28 countries. The study identifies 3 clusters (approaches) to the organization of pension provision for the self-employed: 1 — employee-like mandatory contributions to state pension schemes; 2 — mandatory contributions with advantages; 3 — voluntary pension contributions with advantages. In general, none of the approaches can be called “the best”. The effectiveness of pension decreases with any form of low-income self-employed inclusion in income-based pension schemes, as well as dependent self-employment. The author concludes that for Russia alternative options for self-employed pensions are quasi-mandatory pension insurance, self-employed employee-like participation in voluntary funded pension schemes only, state co-financing, practical training in financial literacy without going into the depth of financial knowledge. Discussion for further research is a detailed study of the application of the results into self-employed pension insurance practice in Russia.

Highlights

  • The rapid development of modern self-employment, the massive transition from employment to self-employment and vice versa is a challenge for traditional pension systems

  • The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) responded by adopting compulsory state pension schemes for the self-employed shared with employees

  • С применением тарифа к части 3 страны (28%): базы для расчета взносов CZ (50%), SL (75%), LT (90%) – – (50–90%)

Read more

Summary

Включены все категории

HU, GR, IS, ES, СА, EE, LU LV, NO, PT, SE самозанятых и SL 2. Включены не все, но основные 3 страны (23%):. AT, BE (не охвачены (исключение временные временных), CZ (занятые низкооплачиваемые самозанятые, совместители) неполный день — платформенные добровольно) самозанятые), IT. Ограниченное участие (высокий 1 страна (8%): порог обязательного участия). 4 страны (27,2%): UK, IR, FI FR, DE (в планах общее обязательное участие), DN, CH

Нет существенных льгот
Валовый доход до уплаты
Findings
Уплата взносов ежегодно
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.