Abstract

Regarding the signing of the China–ASEAN Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) as a quasi-natural experiment, this article uses the difference-in-differences model to examine the pollution emissions of domestic trading enterprises in the face of varying trade openness under international environmental regulations. It is found that trade liberalization will drive domestic trading firms to choose more proactive pollution abatement strategies, namely, the signing of CAFTA facilitates pollution reduction in enterprises trading mainly with CAFTA members. This effect is more significant in non-state-owned enterprises and labor-intensive enterprises. In particular, the effect of becoming a member of CAFTA to facilitate firm-level pollution reduction has a time lag, and its marginal effect tends to expand over time.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call