Abstract

Since the mid-2000s, the American energy industry has undergone profound changes. Having made the so-called shale revolution and achieved impressive results in the field of energy efficiency and renewable energy, the United States of America has not only radically reduced its dependence on imported hydrocarbons, but has begun to increase exports of these commodities. Given the economic weight of the U.S., such changes have significantly transformed the global energy market, requiring leading oil and gas exporters (including Russia) to take non-standard steps (for example, the OPEC+ deal). They also created serious prerequisites for Washington’s revision of its traditional energy policy in the international arena. The author makes a conclusion that the United States has not yet come out of the paradigm of net oil importer, which was formed after the first world oil crisis of 1973-1974. This means that Washington is still committed to the traditional principles of it’s foreign energy policy: diversification of oil import sources; promotion of free trade in world energy; special relations with oil exporters in the Persian Gulf and the strategic importance of the Middle East; reliance on energy suppliers from the Western hemisphere, etc. However, having radically reduced oil and gas imports and having got the opportunity to export them, the United States could not help but bring something new to its energy policy. While still prioritizing security of energy supply, the U.S. under B. Obama has started talking about the American energy independence, and D. Trump has proclaimed the global energy dominance as a new key American goal. The author assumes that global energy dominance implies Washington’s aggressive promotion of the American energy exporters, as well as its intention to turn the U.S. into a technological leader and a key regulator in the global energy market. Moreover, the U.S. has become freer in the matter of sanctions and other pressure on major oil and gas exporters, guided by its geopolitical and economic interests. Due to the growth of the American oil and gas export potential, the confrontation between Moscow and Washington in the energy sector, which began during the Cold war, has now acquired an additional economic dimension. Previously, the United States has tried to restrain the development of the Soviet, later Russian energy industry, but acted purely in the logic of political rivalry, not economic competition. Thus, in the foreseeable future the United States is unlikely to abandon its attempts to politicize and discredit Russia as an energy supplier to Europe and other regions of the world.

Highlights

  • The author makes a conclusion that the United States has not yet come out of the paradigm of net oil importer, which was formed after the first world oil crisis of 1973—1974

  • Due to the growth of the American oil and gas export potential, the confrontation between Moscow and Washington in the energy sector, which began during the Cold war, has acquired an additional economic dimension

  • The United States has tried to restrain the development of the Soviet, later Russian energy industry, but acted purely in the logic of political rivalry, not economic competition

Read more

Summary

Research article

International Dimension of Contemporary U.S Energy Policy: Challenges for Russia and the World. Учитывая экономический вес США, такие изменения заметно трансформировали глобальный энергетический рынок, потребовав от ведущих нефтегазовых экспортеров (включая Россию) нестандартных шагов (к примеру, сделка «ОПЕК+»). Они также создали серьезные предпосылки для пересмотра Вашингтоном своей традиционной энергетической политики на международной арене. Что они все еще сохраняют приверженность традиционным принципам своей внешней энергетической политики: диверсификация источников нефтегазового импорта; продвижение свободной торговли в мировой энергетике; особые отношения с нефтеэкспортерами Персидского залива и стратегический статус Ближнего Востока; ставка на поставщиков энергоносителей из Западного полушария и т. В силу роста нефтегазоэкспортного потенциала США, противостояние Москвы и Вашингтона в энергетической сфере, начавшееся еще в годы холодной войны, отныне приобрело дополнительное экономическое измерение. Международное измерение современной энергетической политики США: вызовы России и миру // Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов.

Насколько глубоки изменения в энергетике США?
Каково влияние США на глобальную энергетику?
Современная энергетическая политика США и новые вызовы России
Библиографический список

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.