Abstract

As we engage in our work in the Women’s Movement and in feminist scholarship, some of us from the so-called Third World are caught in our ambivalence. Faced with the contradictions in the Movement and in feminist agendas, we vacillate between hope and despair. We are frustrated and debilitated by the agendas even as we are encouraged by their possibilities. The “hopes and impediments”1 of the feminist movement and of its offshoot, Women’s Studies, are captured by two oppositional moments in the history of the second wave of the Women’s Movement. These two periods, separated roughly by a couple of decades, allegorize the complexities of feminist engagement. The title of Robin Morgan’s book, Sisterhood is Global, which captures the spirit of the 1960s and 1970s, was greeted on the one hand with enthusiasm and hope and on the other hand with the cynicism that is engendered by feminist exclusions. The mythology of sisterhood was not lost on many of us, although some of us were either too naive or too lazy to probe the reality that the mythology of sisterhood mystifies. The spirit and radical questioning of the 1980s (generated by the “women of color movement”) is captured by the title of another book, Paula Giddings’s When and Where I Enter. That title encapsulates three important elements in feminist debates—history/time (when); location/space (where); and subjectivity/agency (I).

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call