Abstract

Crowdfunding platforms offer project initiators the opportunity to acquire funds from the Internet crowd and, therefore, have become a valuable alternative to traditional sources of funding. However, some processes on crowdfunding platforms cause undesirable external effects that influence the funding success of projects. In this context, we focus on the phenomenon of project overfunding. Massively overfunded projects have been discussed to overshadow other crowdfunding projects which in turn receive less funding. We propose a funding redistribution mechanism to internalize these overfunding externalities and to improve overall funding results. To evaluate this concept, we develop and deploy an agent-based model (ABM). This ABM is based on a multi-attribute decision-making approach and is suitable to simulate the dynamic funding processes on a crowdfunding platform. Our evaluation provides evidence that possible modifications of the crowdfunding mechanisms bear the chance to optimize funding results and to alleviate existing flaws.

Highlights

  • Research has engaged with funding outcomes of campaigns and with several phenomena of individuals’ funding behavior, interestingly, literature concerning the quality or potential optimization of overall funding results is utterly scarce

  • Following the ideas of mechanism design and market engineering, we propose different taxation mechanisms to internalize overfunding externalities and apply our agent-based model in order to evaluate our proposed mechanisms by means of sensitivity analyses

  • Our results show support for applying a taxation mechanism to tackle the problem of massive project overfunding

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Project initiators have to determine the funding goal (e.g., USD 20,000) and the length of the funding period (e.g., 30 days). In the case of all-or-nothing models, which are applied on many platforms, high sums of collected funding have to be given back to the funders because the funding goal was not reached. According to which type of crowdfunding is applied, funders receive different types of compensation for their monetary support. In donation-based crowdfunding, funders do not receive any compensation. Funders derive a certain form of utility from supporting the projects even in the case of donations. The considerations concerning expected utilities are a key driver of the resulting funding decisions (Koch 2017)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call