Abstract

The fabrication of shape-controlled nanocarriers is critical for efficient delivery of biomolecules across the cell membrane. Surface coating of the nanocarrier can improve internalization efficiency. Here, we developed a facile method of silicon nanorod fabrication leading to a controlled size and shape. We then systematically evaluated five surface modifications with membrane proteins from different cancer cell lines including MCF7, MD231, Hela, Panc-PDX, and Panc-1. We demonstrated that silicon nanorods coated with either a homolytic or heterolytic membrane protein coating have significantly improved internalization efficiency as compared with uncoated Si nanorods. To elucidate the molecular mechanism of the improved efficiency associated with a modified coating, we analyzed the coating membrane proteins derived from five cell lines with proteomics and identified 601 proteins shared by different cell sources. These proteins may function as cell-substrate adhesion molecules that contribute to the enhanced internalization. We also tested the internalization efficiency of nanorods with different coatings in each of the five cell lines to determine the influencing factors from target cells. We found that the internalization efficiency varied among different target cells, and the ranking of the average efficiency was as follows: Hela > Panc-PDX > MD231 > MCF7 > Panc-1. The bioinformatics analysis suggested that the low internalization efficiency in Panc-1 cells might be associated with the upregulation of ATXN2, which is a negative regulator of endocytosis. We further demonstrated that ATXN2 knockdown with specific siRNA significantly improved nanorod internalization efficiency in Panc-1 cells suggesting that ATXN2 can be a reference for efficiency prediction of nanoparticle delivery to tumor cells. Thus, we studied the effect of different cancer cell membrane proteins on nanorod uptake efficiencies. These results can improve nanorod internalization to cancer cells, including a fundamental understanding of the internalization efficiency of cancer cells.

Highlights

  • Nanoparticles have been used therapeutically in various diseases [1,2]

  • We found that the internalization efficiency varied among different target cells, and the ranking of the average efficiency was as follows: Hela > Panc-PDX > MD231 > MCF7 > Panc-1

  • The bioinformatics analysis suggested that the low internalization efficiency in Panc-1 cells might be associated with the upregulation of Ataxin 2 (ATXN2), which is a negative regulator of endocytosis

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The interaction between nanoparticles and target cells is critical to the understanding of the internalization efficiency in cells and tissues. The physicochemical properties of nanoparticles, such as shape, size, and surface modification, often determine the internalization dynamics [3,4]. Particle shape and size can modulate the internalization efficiency of nanoparticles [5]. Cells 2019, 8, 931 properties after functionalization with chemical moieties, antibodies, or membrane proteins, i.e., active targeting [6,7]. Many studies have reported wide-ranging internalization efficiencies of different nanocarriers, which warrant further investigation. The rod shape is associated with higher uptake efficiency than that of spherical, plate, or flake-like structures [11,14]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call