Abstract

This article examines the divergent patterns of labour flexibility in two Canadian power transformer plants owned by the same company and producing similar products with identical technologies. The case study results are used to point to three oversimplifications in the flexibility debate: the claim that "numerical" and "functional" flexibility are incompatible; the argument that North American management relies more heavily on external flexibility than on internal flexibility; and the widespread contention that the traditional collective agreement is the chief barrier to achieving a more flexible organization of production in North America.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call