Abstract
BackgroundOsteoporotic acetabular fractures frequently involve the quadrilateral plate (QP), a flat and thin bone constituting the medial wall of the acetabulum. This study aims to assess the impact of the quality of osteoporotic QP fractures reduction on the patients’ functional recovery, at 24 months follow-up.MethodsPatients referring with osteoporotic QP fractures to our Level I trauma centre were prospectively recruited. Inclusion criteria: patients aged 60 years old or older; osteoporosis, defined as Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) T-score ≤ − 2.5; acute acetabular fracture; anatomic or good fracture reduction according to Matta on postoperative CT. Exclusion criteria: moderate cognitive impairment (defined as Mini-Mental State Examination < 19); a history of malignant neoplasm; concomitant fractures in other sites; traumatic head injury; lower limb joint prostheses; patient not able to walk independently before trauma; poor fracture reduction, according to Matta, on postoperative CT. All the QP fractures were surgically managed. After surgery, the reduction of each QP fracture was classified as anatomical (displacement 0–1 mm), good (displacement 2–3 mm) and poor (displacement > 3 mm) on postoperative CT. Based on this classification: patients with a poor fracture reduction were excluded from this study, patients with an anatomical reduction were recruited in Group-A and patients with a good reduction in Group-B. All the patients underwent a clinical and radiographic 24-months follow-up.Results68 patients (males 38; females 30; mean age 68.6 years old; range 60–79) were finally included in in the study. No cases of open fractures or concomitant pelvic ring fractures were observed. Based on the post-operative CT, 39 patients showed an anatomic fracture reduction (Group-A) while the remaining 29 patients revealed a good fracture reduction (Group-B). Complication rates and mean clinical scores showed no significant differences between groups, at 24-months follow-up.ConclusionsIn this study, the functional recovery at 24 months follow-up showed no significant differences in elderly patients with QP fracture undergoing anatomical reconstruction (displacement 0–1 mm) compared to patients receiving a good QP fracture reconstruction (displacement ≤ 3 mm).
Highlights
Acetabular fractures, with a reported annual incidence of 3 new cases over 100,000 inhabitants, are rare but challenging injuries for orthopedic surgeons [1, 2].This kind of fractures commonly results from high-energy trauma, i.e. motor vehicle accidents, pedestrian accidents, sports injuries, and falls from a height [1]
Osteoporotic acetabular fractures frequently involve the quadrilateral plate (QP), a flat and thin bone constituting the medial wall of the acetabulum [5]
Inclusion criteria: patients aged 60 years old or older; osteoporosis, defined as Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) T-score ≤ -2.5; acute acetabular fracture; anatomic or good fracture reduction according to Matta on postoperative CT
Summary
Acetabular fractures, with a reported annual incidence of 3 new cases over 100,000 inhabitants, are rare but challenging injuries for orthopedic surgeons [1, 2]. This kind of fractures commonly results from high-energy trauma, i.e. motor vehicle accidents, pedestrian accidents, sports injuries, and falls from a height [1]. Inclusion criteria: patients aged 60 years old or older; osteoporosis, defined as Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) T-score ≤ − 2.5; acute acetabular fracture; anatomic or good fracture reduction according to Matta on postoperative CT. Conclusions In this study, the functional recovery at 24 months follow-up showed no significant differences in elderly patients with QP fracture undergoing anatomical reconstruction (displacement 0–1 mm) compared to patients receiving a good QP fracture reconstruction (displacement ≤ 3 mm)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
