Abstract
Using a sample of Chinese listed firms and a difference-in-differences research design, we examine how internal control reporting (ICR) affects firms’ bond cost. We find that, during the voluntary ICR period, bondholders only reward voluntary disclosers perceived as having higher quality of ICR and internal control systems. In addition, during the mandatory ICR period voluntary disclosers experience a significantly lower cost of debt than that of nonvoluntary disclosers, which may be explained by voluntary disclosers’ higher quality of internal control. The difference in debt cost is more pronounced when firms operate in high litigation risk and competition-intensive industries, and when the firms’ information environment is weak or the bondholders have a high demand for ICR information.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
