Abstract

This research assesses the thermodynamic consistency of recent marine CO2 system measurements in United States coastal waters. As one means of assessment, we compared aragonite saturation states calculated using various combinations of measured parameters. We also compared directly measured and calculated values of total alkalinity and CO2 fugacity. The primary data set consists of state-of-the-art measurements of the keystone parameters of the marine CO2 system: dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC), total alkalinity (TA), CO2 fugacity (fCO2), and pH. This study is the first thermodynamic CO2 system intercomparison based on measurements obtained using purified meta cresol purple as a pH indicator. The data are from 1890 water samples collected during NOAA's West Coast Ocean Acidification Cruise of 2011 (WCOA2011) and NOAA's Gulf of Mexico and East Coast Carbon Cruise of 2012 (GOMECC-2).Calculations of in situ aragonite saturation states (ΩA) near the saturation horizon exhibited differences on the order of ±10% between predictions based on the (DIC, TA) pair of measurements vs. the (pH, DIC), (fCO2, DIC), or (fCO2, pH) pairs. Differences of this magnitude, which are largely attributable to the imprecision of ΩA calculated from the (DIC, TA) pair, are roughly equivalent to the magnitude of ΩA change projected to occur over the next several decades due to ocean acidification. These observations highlight the importance of including either pH or fCO2 in saturation state calculations.Calculations of TA from (pH, DIC) and (fCO2, DIC) showed that internal consistency could be achieved if minor subtractions of TA (≤4μmolkg−1) were applied to samples of salinity <35. The extent of thermodynamic consistency is also exemplified by the small offset between TA calculated from (DIC, pH) and that calculated from (DIC, fCO2): ~3μmolkg−1, which is similar to the accuracy of the TA measurements. Systematic trends can be detected in the offsets between measured and calculated parameters, but for this high-quality data set the magnitude of methodological improvements required to achieve exact thermodynamic consistency is quite small.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.