Abstract

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients. Current methods to identify patients at high risk of AKI are limited, and few prediction models have been externally validated. To internally and externally validate a machine learning risk score to detect AKI in hospitalized patients. This diagnostic study included 495 971 adult hospital admissions at the University of Chicago (UC) from 2008 to 2016 (n = 48 463), at Loyola University Medical Center (LUMC) from 2007 to 2017 (n = 200 613), and at NorthShore University Health System (NUS) from 2006 to 2016 (n = 246 895) with serum creatinine (SCr) measurements. Patients with an SCr concentration at admission greater than 3.0 mg/dL, with a prior diagnostic code for chronic kidney disease stage 4 or higher, or who received kidney replacement therapy within 48 hours of admission were excluded. A simplified version of a previously published gradient boosted machine AKI prediction algorithm was used; it was validated internally among patients at UC and externally among patients at NUS and LUMC. Prediction of Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes SCr-defined stage 2 AKI within a 48-hour interval was the primary outcome. Discrimination was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The study included 495 971 adult admissions (mean [SD] age, 63 [18] years; 87 689 [17.7%] African American; and 266 866 [53.8%] women) across 3 health systems. The development of stage 2 or higher AKI occurred in 15 664 of 48 463 patients (3.4%) in the UC cohort, 5711 of 200 613 (2.8%) in the LUMC cohort, and 3499 of 246 895 (1.4%) in the NUS cohort. In the UC cohort, 332 patients (0.7%) required kidney replacement therapy compared with 672 patients (0.3%) in the LUMC cohort and 440 patients (0.2%) in the NUS cohort. The AUCs for predicting at least stage 2 AKI in the next 48 hours were 0.86 (95% CI, 0.86-0.86) in the UC cohort, 0.85 (95% CI, 0.84-0.85) in the LUMC cohort, and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.86-0.86) in the NUS cohort. The AUCs for receipt of kidney replacement therapy within 48 hours were 0.96 (95% CI, 0.96-0.96) in the UC cohort, 0.95 (95% CI, 0.94-0.95) in the LUMC cohort, and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.94-0.95) in the NUS cohort. In time-to-event analysis, a probability cutoff of at least 0.057 predicted the onset of stage 2 AKI a median (IQR) of 27 (6.5-93) hours before the eventual doubling in SCr concentrations in the UC cohort, 34.5 (19-85) hours in the NUS cohort, and 39 (19-108) hours in the LUMC cohort. In this study, the machine learning algorithm demonstrated excellent discrimination in both internal and external validation, supporting its generalizability and potential as a clinical decision support tool to improve AKI detection and outcomes.

Highlights

  • Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common clinical syndrome in hospitalized patients and is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and cost of care.[1,2,3] Consensus criteria define AKI by either an increase in serum creatinine (SCr) concentration or a decrease in urine output.[4]

  • In the University of Chicago (UC) cohort, 332 patients (0.7%) required kidney replacement therapy compared with 672 patients (0.3%) in the Loyola University Medical Center (LUMC) cohort and 440 patients (0.2%) in the NorthShore University Health System (NUS) cohort

  • The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for predicting at least stage 2 AKI in the 48 hours were 0.86 in the UC cohort, 0.85 in the LUMC cohort, and 0.86 in the NUS cohort

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common clinical syndrome in hospitalized patients and is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and cost of care.[1,2,3] Consensus criteria define AKI by either an increase in serum creatinine (SCr) concentration or a decrease in urine output.[4]. While work on urinary and serum biomarkers of early AKI continues,[5,6,7] several groups have reported on the accuracy of electronic health record–based risk scores that can identify AKI before changes in SCr concentration.[8,9,10,11,12,13,14] The scope of these published algorithms has varied, with some focusing on only ward or intensive care unit (ICU) patients and others on postoperative AKI.[8,9,10,11,12,13,14] these algorithms range from rule-based, more parsimonious scores to complex, machine learning–based scores.[8,10,13] regardless of the individual score, there has been limited external validation of these risk assessment tools. We aim to both internally (at UC) and externally validate the simplified version of our AKI score using retrospective cohorts from independent health systems (Loyola University Medical Center [LUMC], Maywood, Illinois, and Northshore University Health System [NUS], Evanston, Illinois)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call