Abstract

Breneman D, Fleisher AB, Abramovitis A, et al. J Am Acad Dermatol . 2008;58(6):990–999 PURPOSE OF THE STUDY. To examine the usefulness of regular intermittent therapy instead of treating flares for the approach of atopic dermatitis (AD). STUDY POPULATION. A total of 383 patients were randomly assigned to the stabilization phase, and 288 patients were controlled on tacrolimus ointment. There were 68 children (aged 2–16 years) and 57 adults (>16 years) in the tacrolimus arm and 37 children and 35 adults in the vehicle arm. Eighty-five percent had moderate AD, and 15% had severe AD. METHODS. Adult and pediatric patients with moderate-to-severe AD who were clear of disease after up to 16 weeks of treatment with tacrolimus ointment were randomly assigned in a double-blind fashion to 3-times-weekly treatment with either tacrolimus ointment (0.03% or 0.1%) or vehicle for 40 weeks. The primary end point was the number of flare-free treatment days. Relapses were treated with open-labeled tacrolimus. RESULTS. There were 288 patients who entered the randomization phase. The largest reasons for not finishing the stabilization phase were voluntary patient withdrawal for 95 patients and loss to follow-up for 55 patients. Only 16 (4.2%) patients were withdrawn for lack of efficacy. A total of 125 patients were randomly assigned to tacrolimus, and 72 patients were assigned to vehicle. The mean number of flare-free treatment days was 177 for the tacrolimus group and 134 for the vehicle group ( P = .003). Median time to first relapse was 169 days for the tacrolimus group and 43 for the vehicle group ( P = .037). CONCLUSIONS. Maintenance therapy with tacrolimus ointment was associated with significantly more flare-free days compared with vehicle and a significantly longer time until first disease relapse. REVIEWER COMMENTS. This article examined the possibility of proactive treatment of AD instead of reacting to flares. The principle is similar to the use of maintenance medication for asthma. Similar results were seen with topical fluticasone propionate (Berth-Jones J, Damstra RJ, Golsch S, et al. BMJ . 2003;326[7403]:1367). One significant limitation is that the study only included patients who responded to topical tacrolimus. The question now is whether it can be generalized to all patients with AD or patients not controlled with daily topical therapies.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call