Intermediate-Scale Investigation of Enhanced-Solubilization Agents on the Dissolution and Removal of a Multicomponent Dense Nonaqueous Phase Liquid (DNAPL) Source

Abstract

The presence of multicomponent nonaqueous phase liquid (NAPL) source zones in the subsurface can significantly complicate remediation efforts, transport predictions, and the development of accurate risk assessments. A series of flow-cell experiments was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of two different enhanced-solubilization agents for the removal of a multicomponent dense nonaqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) source zone from homogeneous porous media. The source zone consisted of an equal 1:1:1 mole mixture of cis-1,2-dichloroethene (DCE), trichloroethene (TCE), and tetrachloroethene (PCE) with NAPL saturation (Sn) targeted between 8 and 14 %. Solutions (5 wt%) of hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (HPCD) and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) were flushed through the flow-cell system until nearly complete contaminant removal was achieved. Analysis of elution curves indicate that SDS was approximately 10 times more efficient at removing all three components from the system compared to HPCD. Although enhancement factor magnitudes vary for each specific contaminant component and enhanced-solubilization agent, the lowest-solubility contaminant component (i.e., PCE) consistently experienced the greatest relative solubility enhancement during flushing. SDS was generally superior when evaluated on a recovery basis; however, HPCD outperformed SDS for all contaminant components when compared based on moles-contaminant to moles-reagent removal efficiency analysis. Contaminant mass flux reduction analysis showed that enhanced-solubilization flushing (HPCD and SDS) resulted in general inefficient contaminant removal behavior. Raoult’s Law could be used to successfully predict aqueous contaminant concentrations from the multicomponent DNAPL source zone, indicating that dissolution processes were relatively ideal during both HPCD and SDS enhanced-solubilization flushing. These findings suggest that multicomponent NAPL source dissolution and removal depend upon the flushing agent itself and of the solubility and properties of the individual components of the NAPL mixture. The selection of a particular enhanced-flushing agent should be evaluated carefully prior to remediation as the dissolution, removal, and mass flux behavior of each component can vary significantly.