Abstract
Monroe, M. C., R. Plate, and A. Oxarart. 2013. Intermediate collaborative adaptive management strategies build stakeholder capacity. Ecology and Society 18(2): 24. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05444-180224
Highlights
Adaptive management represents an institutional response as resource management evolves from static, linear models of species or issues to social-ecological models that involve dynamic, “messy” relationships and less predictable conditions
CONCLUSION the model provided by the Springs Basin Working Groups (SBWG) is not an example of collaborative adaptive management (CAM), it does offer insights regarding how to overcome initial barriers to implementing CAM successfully
The starting point for implementing CAM depends on the context and specifics of the social-ecological systems in question
Summary
Adaptive management represents an institutional response as resource management evolves from static, linear models of species or issues to social-ecological models that involve dynamic, “messy” relationships and less predictable conditions. Agency experts, and community members use a variety of strategies, such as workshops, multistakeholder processes, social learning, communities of practice, and institutional commitments of time and resources, to establish priorities, craft management plans, and monitor changes in resources (Daniels and Walker 2001, Keen et al 2005, Pahl-Wostl et al 2007, Flitcroft et al 2009, Rodela 2011) Such activities necessitate that participants have a strong understanding of the system they are managing and a healthy ability to work together
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
