Abstract

Cognitive heuristics are mental shortcuts adapted over time to enable rapid interpretation of our complex environment. They are intrinsic to human cognition and resist modification. Heuristics applied outside the context to which they are best suited are termed cognitive bias, and are the cause of systematic errors in judgment and reasoning. As both a cognitive and intuitive discipline, design by individuals is vulnerable to context-inappropriate heuristic usage. Designing in groups can act positively to counterbalance these tendencies, but is subject to heuristic misuse and biases particular to social environments. Mismatch between desired and actual outcomes– termed here, design distortion – occurs when such usage goes unnoticed and unaddressed, and can affect multiple dimensions of a system. We propose a methodology, interliminal design, emerging from the Program in Collaborative Design at Pacific Northwest College of Art, to specifically address the influence of cognitive heuristics in design. This adaptive approach involves reflective, dialogic, inquiry-driven practices intended to increase awareness of heuristic usage, and identify aspects of the design process vulnerable to misuse on both individual and group levels. By facilitating the detection and mitigation of potentially costly errors in judgment and decision-making that create distortion, such metacognitive techniques can meaningfully improve design.

Highlights

  • Our globally interconnected and information-rich world is comprised of complex systems operating under vast uncertainty

  • It is becoming increasingly clear that to take substantive action in today’s wicked problems, design thinking (Nelson & Stolterman, 2003) must be directed by lucid, purpose-driven intention that is rooted in a deep appreciation of complex system dynamics and inter-relationships

  • We use the 2008 global financial crisis to illustrate how context can distort the utility of cognitive heuristics, and discuss the resultant biases that skew otherwise reasonable decision-making and resultant outcomes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Our globally interconnected and information-rich world is comprised of complex systems operating under vast uncertainty. While a general explanation of many aspects of apparently irrational human behavior (Kahneman, 2011), heuristics can be considered ecologically rational (Goldstein & Gigerenzer, 2002) cognitive tools that exploit the structure of environmental information to allow good-enough judgment and action in real time.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.