Abstract

IntroductionThe indirect immunofluorescence assay on HEp-2 cells (HEp-2/IFA) is used worldwide for screening for autoantibodies to cellular antigens. Cell culture and fixation methods influence the cell distribution of autoantigens and the preservation of epitopes. Therefore, discrepancy of results obtained using different HEp-2/IFA kits (interkit nonreproducibility) is a common phenomenon in the clinical laboratory routine.ObjectiveThis study evaluated the interkit nonreproducibility of HEp-2/IFA results using samples from patients with systemic autoimmune disease (SAD), nonautoimmune diseases (NAD), and healthy blood donors (HBD).MethodsSerum from 275 SAD patients, 293 NAD patients, and 300 HBD were processed at 1:80 dilution using four HEp-2 kits according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Interkit reproducibility was determined for positive/negative results and patterns. The agreement of positive/negative results among kits for each sample was determined as the reactivity agreement score (RAS). The pattern reproducibility score (PRS) in each sample was calculated as a function of the number of kits showing equivalent patterns. Qualitative variables and ordinal variables were analyzed by the Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests, respectively.ResultsA total of 402 samples were nonreactive in all kits and were considered devoid of autoantibodies. Further analysis included the 466 reactive samples (238 SAD, 119 NAD, 109 HBD). Reactivity to the nucleus had the highest interkit reproducibility (RAS = 83.6), followed by the metaphase plate (RAS = 78.9), cytoplasm (RAS = 77.4), and nucleolus (RAS = 72.4). Interkit reproducibility was higher in SAD (RAS = 78.0) than in NAD (RAS = 70.6) and HBD (RAS = 71.3) groups. Samples with strong reactivity (++++/4 and +++/4) had higher interkit reproducibility than those with weak reactivity (+/4). In the SAD group, RAS for nuclear reactivity was 87.5% for strongly reactive samples as opposed to 4.4% for weakly reactive samples, and the same was observed for NAD and HBD samples. The most robust patterns were the centromere AC-3 (PRS = 78.4), multiple nuclear dots AC-6 (PRS = 73.6), nuclear coarse speckled AC-5 (PRS = 71.3), nuclear homogeneous AC-1 (PRS = 67.9), and the reticular cytoplasmic AC-21 (PRS = 68.6).ConclusionInterkit nonreproducibility in HEp-2/IFA is prevalent and occurs with the highest frequency with weakly reactive samples. International initiatives with the engagement of in vitro diagnostic industry are encouraged to promote the harmonization of the properties and performance of HEp-2/IFA commercial kits.

Highlights

  • The indirect immunofluorescence assay on HEp-2 cells (HEp-2/IFA) is used worldwide for screening for autoantibodies to cellular antigens

  • The indirect immunofluorescence assay on HEp-2 cells (HEp-2IFA) is the most frequently used method for screening for the presence of a vast array of autoantibodies and was considered the gold standard by a task force commissioned by the American College of Rheumatology [1, 2]

  • The results show that some patterns (AC-1, AC-2, AC-3, AC-7, AC-8, AC-9, AC-10, AC-19, and nuclear quasihomogeneous) were rather robust in that they were appropriately identified with all kits and in at least two of the three participating laboratories

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The indirect immunofluorescence assay on HEp-2 cells (HEp-2/IFA) is used worldwide for screening for autoantibodies to cellular antigens. The indirect immunofluorescence assay on HEp-2 cells (HEp-2IFA) is the most frequently used method for screening for the presence of a vast array of autoantibodies and was considered the gold standard by a task force commissioned by the American College of Rheumatology [1, 2]. The immunofluorescence (IF) pattern of the HEp-2-IFA test provides hints for the autoantibody specificities present in the sample [5,6,7,8,9,10], as it reflects the characteristic topographic distribution of the target antigens along the successive stages of the cell cycle. The ICAP website www. anapatterns.org displays the classification algorithm including 30 patterns with their respective alphanumeric AC (anticellular) codes, correspondent images, possible target antigens, and clinical relevance [9, 10]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call