Abstract
This paper examines the desirability of having an interim performance evaluation (IPE) in the design of an optimal contract. While enabling the principal to plan and control the project process better, the IPE may also adversely affect the agent's morale in case of unfavorable IPE outcome. Despite this, we show that it is without loss of generality using contracts that tailor effort or payment to the IPE result when it involves objective measures. In the environment in which it involves subjective measures, not using IPE may be in the principal's interest; the reason is that the contract now features a progressive payment scheme that renders extra costs upon information disclosure.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
