Abstract

This research is devoted to the disclosure of the institution of precautionary measures, namely - securing the claim, which is one of the procedural mechanisms for ensuring access to justice. Because it is the possibility of execution of the final court decision that will ensure a fair trial for each participant in the process.
 To ensure the reliability and completeness of the results obtained by the authors in this study used a set of general and special methods that are characteristic primarily of legal science. The integrated use of such methods ensured the achievement of the purpose and objectives of the study, as well as the persuasiveness of the conclusions. In particular, the dialectical method was used to study the legal nature and significance of the institution of precautionary measures in civil and commercial proceedings. Methods of analysis and synthesis were used in the formulation of basic concepts, such as «precautionary measures», «securing the claim» and so on. The historical and legal method allowed us to focus on the process of legal regulation and legislative consolidation of the institution of security measures. The formal-logical method was used in the analysis of the norms of the current legislation and theoretical developments concerning, in particular, the essence of procedural tools of accessibility or restriction of access to justice. The empirical basis of the study was the materials of domestic judicial practice.
 Based on the study, the authors conclude that securing the claim as a procedural phenomenon cannot remain unchanged, it acquires new features over time, loses archaic elements, but still does not lose, but rather, on the contrary, increases its importance in modern civil process. Now securing the claim is an integral part of the institution of security measures (along with the provision of evidence), which corresponds to the protected function. Thus, the actual enforcement of court decisions is largely intended to guarantee the institution of securing the claim as one of the types of precautionary measures. Participants in civil proceedings apply to this institution in order to guarantee the execution of future court decisions and prevent them from causing significant harm.

Highlights

  • Заборовський В.В., доктор юридичних наук, професор, професор кафедри цивільного права та процесу ДВНЗ «Ужгородський національний університет» https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5845-7535

  • Учасники цивільного судочинства звертаються до даного інституту з метою гарантії виконання майбутнього судового рішення і превенції заподіяння їм значної шкоди

  • Велика Палата Верховного Суду [4] у своєму рішенні зазначила, що розглядаючи заяву про забезпечення позову, суд повинен врахувати, що вжиття відповідних заходів може забезпечити належне виконання рішення про задоволення позову у разі ухвалення цього рішення, а їх невжиття, – навпаки, ускладнити або навіть унеможливити таке виконання

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Заборовський В.В., доктор юридичних наук, професор, професор кафедри цивільного права та процесу ДВНЗ «Ужгородський національний університет» https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5845-7535. Дане наукове дослідження присвячене розкриттю інституту забезпечувальних заходів, а саме – забезпечення позову, яке є одним із процесуальних механізмів реалізації доступності правосуддя.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.