Abstract

PurposeInterhospital referral is a consequence of centralization of complex oncological care but might negatively impact waiting time, a quality indicator in the Netherlands. This study aims to evaluate characteristics and waiting times of patients with primary colorectal cancer who are referred between hospitals.MethodsData were extracted from the Dutch ColoRectal Audit (2015-2019). Waiting time between first tumor-positive biopsy until first treatment was compared between subgroups stratified for referral status, disease stage, and type of hospital.ResultsIn total, 46,561 patients were included. Patients treated for colon or rectal cancer in secondary care hospitals were referred in 12.2% and 14.7%, respectively. In tertiary care hospitals, corresponding referral rates were 43.8% and 66.4%. Referred patients in tertiary care hospitals were younger, but had a more advanced disease stage, and underwent more often multivisceral resection and simultaneous metastasectomy than non-referred patients in secondary care hospitals (p<0.001). Referred patients were more often treated within national quality standards for waiting time compared to non-referred patients (p<0.001). For referred patients, longer waiting times prior to MDT were observed compared to non-referred patients within each hospital type, although most time was spent post-MDT.ConclusionA large proportion of colorectal cancer patients that are treated in tertiary care hospitals are referred from another hospital but mostly treated within standards for waiting time. These patients are younger but often have a more advanced disease. This suggests that these patients are willing to travel more but also reflects successful centralization of complex oncological patients in the Netherlands.

Highlights

  • Waiting times in oncologic care may cause psychological harm to patients [1,2,3,4,5]

  • No profound scientific evidence exists for the association of delays in colorectal cancer treatment on survival [11,12,13,14,15], which could be due to the slow tumor progression [16, 17], it is increasingly seen as a hospital quality indicator

  • RF colon and rectal cancer patients in tertiary care hospitals had a higher risk of getting a stoma (p

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Waiting times in oncologic care may cause psychological harm to patients [1,2,3,4,5]. A maximum waiting time from diagnosis until first treatment of 5 weeks was established. If a patient is referred to another hospital, an extra 3 weeks can be added to the maximum waiting time. No profound scientific evidence exists for the association of delays in colorectal cancer treatment on survival [11,12,13,14,15], which could be due to the slow tumor progression [16, 17], it is increasingly seen as a hospital quality indicator

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call