Abstract

This paper provides a simple model of hierarchical education to study the political determination of public education spending and its allocation between different tiers of education. The model integrates private education decisions by allowing parents, who are differentiated according to income and human capital, to top up public expenditures with private transfers. We identify four groups of households with conflicting preferences over the the size of the public education budget and its allocation. In equilibrium, public education budget, private expenditures and expenditure allocation among different tiers of education, depend on which group of households is in power and on country-specific features such as income inequality and intergenerational persistence in education. By running a cluster analysis on 32 OECD countries, we seek to establish if distinctive ‘education regimes’, akin to those identified in the theoretical analysis, could be discerned. Our main finding is that a high intergenerational persistence in education might foster the establishment of education regimes in which the size and the allocation of the public budget among different tiers of education prevent a stable and significant increase of the population graduation rate, thus plunging the country in a ‘low education’ trap.

Highlights

  • Education expenditures, allocation between tiers of education and source of financing vary considerably over the world, even among OECD countries

  • We show that if the interests of low-educated households prevail, the equilibrium features a low level of public spending, unbalanced towards basic education, the more so the higher is the intergenerational persistence in education

  • Based on our model’s results and on the empirical evidence presented, the main policy message of our analysis is that the call for an increase of public education expenditures to favour equality of opportunities, might not receive political support

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Allocation between tiers of education and source of financing vary considerably over the world, even among OECD countries. These differences have important consequences for the quality and equity of the education system.. A value of the index greater (lower) than one indicates that the country’s public education spending is unbalanced towards tertiary (basic) education

Objectives
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.