Abstract

AbstractThe concept of intergenerational fairness has taken hold across Europe since the 2008 financial crisis. In the United Kingdom (UK), focus on intergenerational conflict has been further sharpened by the 2016 ‘Brexit’ vote to take the UK out of the European Union. However, current debates around intergenerational fairness are taking place among policy makers, the media and in think-tanks. In this way, they are conversations about, but not with, people. This article draws on qualitative interviews with 40 people aged 19–85 years and living in North-East England and Edinburgh, Scotland's capital city, to explore whether macro-level intergenerational equity discourses resonate in people's everyday lives. We find widespread pessimism around young people's prospects and evidence of a fracturing social contract, with little faith in the principles of intergenerational equity, equality and reciprocity upon which welfare states depend. Although often strong, the kin contract was not fully ameliorating resentment and frustration among participants observing societal-level intergenerational unfairness mirrored within families. However, blame for intergenerational inequity was placed on a remote state rather than on older generations. Despite the precariousness of the welfare state, participants of all ages strongly supported the principle of state support, rejecting a system based on family wealth and inherited privilege. Rather than increased individualism, participants desired strengthened communities that encouraged greater intergenerational mixing.

Highlights

  • The concept of intergenerational fairness, prominent in the United States of America (USA) for over 30 years, has rapidly taken hold across Europe since the 2008 global financial crisis (Kohli, 2006; Bristow, 2016; Alexander Shaw, 2018)

  • Despite increasingly strident rhetoric, current intergenerational conflict debates are largely conversations about, but not with, people (Alexander Shaw, 2018), and this qualitative study asks whether higher-level narratives of intergenerational conflict are reflected in the everyday lives of people living in two regions in the north of the United Kingdom (UK)

  • Three main themes emerged from the data: (a) the fragility of the state-level intergenerational social contract and the range of challenges facing younger people, and a ‘struggling middle’ and older people requiring care; (b) the political becoming personal within families where the fracturing social contract and differing world-views were creating frustration and resentment; and (c) blame assigned not to older generations but to a ‘socially ignorant’ state

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The concept of intergenerational fairness, prominent in the United States of America (USA) for over 30 years, has rapidly taken hold across Europe since the 2008 global financial crisis (Kohli, 2006; Bristow, 2016; Alexander Shaw, 2018). In the United Kingdom (UK), the focus on intergenerational conflict has been further sharpened by the 2016 vote to leave the European Union (EU) (popularly termed ‘Brexit’), widely characterised as a schism between older, socially conservative, and younger, progressively liberal, generations (NatCen, 2017). We review the current state of the intergenerational social contract and describe how this study operationalises the slippery concept of generations

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call