Abstract
This paper addresses the problem of interferometric noise reduction in Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) interferometry based on sparse and redundant representations over a trained dictionary. The idea is to use a Proximity-based K-SVD (ProK-SVD) algorithm on interferometric data for obtaining a suitable dictionary, in order to extract the phase image content effectively. We implemented this strategy on both simulated as well as real interferometric data for the validation of our approach. For synthetic data, three different training dictionaries have been compared, namely, a dictionary extracted from the data, a dictionary obtained by a uniform random distribution in , and a dictionary built from discrete cosine transform. Further, a similar strategy plan has been applied to real interferograms. We used interferometric data of various SAR sensors, including low resolution C-band ERS/ENVISAT, medium L-band ALOS, and high resolution X-band COSMO-SkyMed, all over an area of Mt. Etna, Italy. Both on simulated and real interferometric phase images, the proposed approach shows significant noise reduction within the fringe pattern, without any considerable loss of useful information.
Highlights
Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9] is a consolidated remote sensing technique with broad applications in the field of Earth and environmental sciences
Three different training dictionaries have been compared, namely, a dictionary extracted from the data, a dictionary obtained by a uniform random distribution in [−π, π ], and a dictionary built from discrete cosine transform
SAR interferograms are affected by several decorrelation effects, depending on different noise sources, which collectively produce interferogram phase noise
Summary
Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9] is a consolidated remote sensing technique with broad applications in the field of Earth and environmental sciences. SAR interferograms are affected by several decorrelation effects, depending on different noise sources, which collectively produce interferogram phase noise. Decorrelation stems from system noise, processing errors and other internal and external factors (e.g., atmospheric fluctuations) [6,9,11]. Several techniques have been proposed in the literature for getting rid of the decorrelation effects in the interferometric phase noise. Non-adaptive filtering methods, including the mean filtering technique proposed by Rosen [9], are not so effective for InSAR interferograms. The adoption of some fixed windows for filtering can induce phase distortions due to the periodic character of interferograms not being considered
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.