Abstract

AbstractThe interpretations of relevant interfaces (i.e. the surface and bed) in radar sounding datasets over glaciers and ice sheets are primary boundary conditions in a variety of climate studies and particularly subglacial water routing models. It is therefore necessary to ensure these interpretations are consistent and not affected by cross-track clutter. For the surface interface, interferometry and a family of methods relying on digital elevation models have been used to successfully discriminate cross-track surface clutter. Here we present how interferometry can be applied to the problem of basal clutter from cross-track bed topography. Our approach is based on a comparison of the differential phases of ambiguous reflectors that may represent bed clutter and the differential phase of a reflector in an adjacent area that appears unaffected by basal clutter. The reflector yielding the smallest interferometric phase difference relative to the unambiguous bed reflector is considered to represent its consistent continuation. We successfully demonstrate our approach using 60 MHz center frequency MARFA data collected over Devon Ice Cap in the Canadian Arctic. Finally, we investigate the effects of clutter-affected and interferometry-corrected bed interpretations on ice layer thickness estimates, basal hydraulic head gradients and the potential extent of inferred subglacial water bodies.

Highlights

  • Radar sounding has been a method of choice in the large-scale characterization of ice sheets, ice caps and glaciers

  • The results of our analysis have shown radar sounding interferometry is capable of discriminating basal clutter, leading to a more consistent interpretation of the bed

  • Cross-track clutter represents a source of ambiguity and impediment in the consistent interpretation of surface and bed horizons from synthetic aperture radar (SAR)-focused radar sounding data

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Radar sounding has been a method of choice in the large-scale characterization of ice sheets, ice caps and glaciers (de Robin, 1975; Bingham and Siegert, 2007). Can radar sounding measurements be qualitatively interpreted to yield estimates of the ice mass thicknesses and underlying bed topographies but the quantitative interpretation of radar bed echo strengths is used to characterize subglacial hydrology and identify bodies of subglacial liquid water (i.e. lakes) (Shabtaie and Bentley, 1988; Wright and Siegert, 2012; Young and others, 2016; Rutishauser and others, 2018). These interpretations provide critical boundary conditions for glacial dynamic and subglacial hydrology models as well as potential targets for extreme habitat microbiological studies. The end effect is a radar image (the radargram) that may contain anomalous signals reflected from cross-track off-nadir surface and subsurface features (i.e. clutter) that can be misinterpreted as a reflector of interest

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call