Abstract

BackgroundA falsely high cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) total protein (TP) result measured by pyrogallol red (PGR) method was suspected to be caused by preparation of the collection site with povidone–iodine (PVP–iodine) solution. MethodsCSF TP was evaluated for interference in samples with different final concentrations of PVP–iodine (up to 0.25% PVP and 0.025% iodine) or iodine alone (up to 0.025% iodine) using three methods: PGR, modified biuret and benzethonium chloride (BZTC). Interference exceeding ±20% of the baseline value is considered clinically significant according to the criterion defined by the College of American Pathologists. ResultsThere were positive interference with the PGR method and negative inference for the BZTC method in CSF samples spiked with PVP–iodine. The PVP–iodine (up to 0.25% PVP and 0.025% iodine) did not cause a clinically significant interference with the modified biuret method. PVP alone without iodine caused a positive interference with the PGR method but did not interfere with the modified biuret or the BZTC method. When the samples were spiked with iodine alone, none of the three methods was affected (change<20%) by iodine concentration up to 0.025%. ConclusionsContamination of CSF specimens with PVP–iodine can lead to interference with CSF TP measurements using PGR or BZTC methods.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call