Abstract

While interference mitigation techniques can significantly improve the performance of a Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) receiver in the presence of jamming, they can also introduce distortions, biases and delays on the GNSS measurements and on the final receiver solution. We analyze the impact of five interference mitigation techniques on the solution provided by a GNSS timing receiver that operates in a known location and under static conditions. In this configuration, the receiver only estimates its clock bias and drift, which can be potentially affected by interference mitigation. The analysis has been performed considering a multiconstellation case, including GPS L1 Coarse Acquisition (C/A), Galileo E1b/c and Beidou B1c signals. Tests were also conducted on the wideband Galileo E5b modulation. In all cases, real jammers were used to challenge GNSS signal reception. The techniques analyzed are four Robust Interference Mitigation (RIM) approaches and the Adaptive Notch Filter (ANF). From the analysis, it emerges that RIM techniques do not affect the receiver clock bias and drift. On the other hand, the ANF introduces a modulation-dependent delay on the clock bias. This delay is difficult to predict and is common to signals adopting modulations with similar spectral characteristics. In this respect, interoperable signals such as the Galileo E1b/c and Beidou B1c components are affected in the same way by the ANF, which leaves the Galileo–Beidou intersystem bias unaltered. Stability analysis has also been performed: interference mitigation does not significantly increase the short-term characteristics of the estimated clock bias and drift for low jamming levels.

Highlights

  • Interference mitigation techniques can significantly improve Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) receiver performance in the presence of jamming and of other unwanted Radio-Frequency (RF) emissions

  • As for the Galileo E1c and Beidou B1c signal, the pilot component (Quadrature signal) was used for the measurement generation allowing the use of a pure Phase Lock Loop (PLL)

  • S interval), the impact of jamming can be neglected. In this part of the test, the clock bias differences observed for Robust Interference Mitigation (RIM) techniques are in the order of a few picoseconds and are significantly lower than the values observed in Figs. 5 and 10

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Interference mitigation techniques can significantly improve Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) receiver performance in the presence of jamming and of other unwanted Radio-Frequency (RF) emissions. As discussed by Dovis (2015), most interference mitigation techniques are implemented at the early stages of the receiver and operate on the digital samples provided by the receiver front end. In this way, significant performance improvements can be achieved, mostly at the signal processing stages such as acquisition and tracking. The user position is assumed known and the receiver is operated in static conditions as discussed in Guo et al (2019). The RIM framework was introduced by Borio (2017) and further

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call