Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the interference in Triiodothyronine (T 3) analysis on the Immuno 1 Analyzer. Methods: We analyzed 686 samples for T 3 using the Miles Technicon Immuno 1 Analyzer. We compared the results of 318 samples with those given by radioimmunoassay (RIA) and the remaining 368 results with those given by the Ciba-Corning ACS 180 analyzer. Results: On the Immuno 1 correlated with those by RIA or chemiluminescence immunoassay. However, results on eight patients by the Immuno 1 method were anomalously elevated. We attempted to find and eliminate the cause of the interference on the Immuno 1. Although the method uses an alkaline phosphatase labelled T 3 analog and fluoresceinated monoclonal antibody, serum binding of fluorescein or alkaline phosphatase did not appear to be the major causes of the interference. Ethanol extraction of samples followed by reconstitution in zero calibrator was the only reliable way to eliminate the interference. Conclusion: The Immuno 1 assay was more prone to interference than other methods. Until it is reformulated, we recommend that users assay ethanol extracts of samples with unexpectedly high T 3.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
