Abstract
Interfacial evaluation of the untreated and treated Jute and Hemp fibers reinforced different matrix polypropylene-maleic anhydride polypropylene copolymer (PP-MAPP) composites was investigated by micromechanical technique combined with acoustic emission (AE) and dynamic contact angle measurement. For the statistical tensile strength of Jute and Hemp fibers, bimodal Weibull distribution was fitted better than the unimodal distribution. The acid–base parameter on the interfacial shear strength (IFSS) of the natural fiber composites was characterized by calculating the work adhesion, W a. The effect of alkaline, silane coupling agent on natural fibers was obtained with changing MAPP content in PP-MAPP matrices. Alkaline treated fibers made the surface energy to be higher due to the removal of the weak boundary layers and thus increasing surface area, whereas the surface energy of silane treated Jute and Hemp fibers decreased due to blocked high energy sites. MAPP in the PP-MAPP matrix caused the surface energy to increase due to introduced acid–base sites. Microfailure modes of two natural fiber composites were observed clearly differently due to different tensile strength of natural fibers and the consistent results were also shown by nondestructive AE analysis indirectly.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
