Abstract

AbstractFiber/matrix interfaces in continuous fiber‐reinforced composites are the regions of imperfections, high dislocation densities and residual stresses that affect the material's properties. The interfacial bond integrity, dislocation substructure and precipitate morphology in the interfiber matrix region in diffusion‐bonded graphite–aluminum (Gr–Al), graphite–magnesium (Gr–Mg) and cast Gr–Mg composites has been examined by transmission electron microscopy. This paper discusses the observations of the typical interface structure in Gr–Al and Gr–Mg composites. The Gr–Al composites exhibit different precipitate morphologies (blocky, lath‐shaped and fine cuboidal of similar chemical composition) and Gr–Mg composites show both spherical and lamellar Mg17Al12 precipitates. A typical interface structure in diffusion‐bonded composites exhibits no voids and reaction compounds, whereas in cast Gr–Mg composites patches of microvoids are observed sporadically near the interface, along with Mg2Si and MgO phases formed due to the chemical interaction between the matrix and SiO2 fiber coating. Adjacent to the interface, both Gr–Al and Gr–Mg exhibit a high density of dislocations that can be attributed to the residual stress state generated because of differential contraction between the fiber and matrix during the fabrication process. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.