Abstract

The floating frame of reference techniques is an established technique to incorporate flexibility in multibody models. The model dimension of the body flexibility models can be reduced by model reduction techniques such as Component Mode Synthesis (CMS) or Krylov subspace-based techniques, but the efficiency of these techniques is limited by the number of interface nodes in which the flexible body is or can be loaded. A common solution to this problem is condensing the different nodes of a given interface surface into a single node, which represents the net motion of the interface surface. Commercial finite element packages offer two modeling techniques to condense interface surfaces: rigid multipoint constraints and interpolation multipoint constraints. Rigid multipoint constraints will typically result in stiffness overestimation, whereas interpolation multipoint constraints will lead to an underestimation. Which approximation of both is most suitable depends on the application. However, the default definition of interpolation multipoint constraints does not allow generation of reduced body flexibility models for multibody models. This paper gives a theoretical background of the problem cause, and offers a practical solution. The two modeling techniques result in significantly different approximations of the body flexibility dynamics, as is shown in a numerical example.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call