Abstract
A vertical spring had a changeable horizontal stiffness to avoid resonance under a seismic displacement, and a viscous damper had a perfect energy dissipation function to reduce the seismic displacement. They were joined together to achieve a seismic isolation system considerably reducing the seismic acceleration response, however, their displacement should be paid more attentions under an earthquake or in a shaking table test. Because the interface friction in the system affected the scaling process of the system in the shaking table test and the corresponding displacement responses, the system was numerically scaled before a real shaking table test. The comparison between the displacement responses of scaled models and prototype models shows that the spatial friction variation and the gravity distortion are the error sources of the relative and residual displacements of scaled models. The error of scaled relative displacement is reduced by the means of increasing PGA, damping constant, spring constant or reducing vertical spring length with zero stress, however, the error of scaled residual displacement is still chaotic under these means. Only if the error sources above are eliminated fundamentally will the error of scaled models be avoided. The conclusions are validated correct by a real shaking table test.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.