Abstract

Influenza virus neuraminidase (iNA) is a homotetrameric surface protein of the influenza virus and an established target for antiviral drugs. In contrast to neuraminidases (NAs) of other biological systems (non-iNAs), enzymatic activity of iNA is only observed in a quaternary assembly and iNA needs the tetramerization to mediate enzymatic activity. Obviously, differences on a molecular level between iNA and non-iNAs are responsible for this intriguing observation. Comparison between protein structures and multiple sequence alignment allow the identification of differences in amino acid composition in crucial regions of the enzyme, such as next to the conserved D151 and the 150-loop. These differences in amino acid sequence and protein tetramerization are likely to alter the dynamics of the system. Therefore, we performed molecular dynamics simulations to investigate differences in the molecular flexibility of monomers, dimers, and tetramers of iNAs of subtype N1 (avian 2004, pandemic 1918 and pandemic 2009 iNA) and as comparison the non-iNA monomer from Clostridium perfringens. We show that conformational transitions of iNA are crucially influenced by its assembly state. The protein–protein interface induces a complex hydrogen-bonding network between the 110-helix and the 150-loop, which consequently stabilizes the structural arrangement of the binding site. Therefore, we claim that these altered dynamics are responsible for the dependence of iNA’s catalytic activity on the tetrameric assembly. Only the tetramerization-induced balance between stabilization and altered local flexibility in the binding site provides the appropriate arrangement of key residues for iNA’s catalytic activity.

Highlights

  • The enzyme class of neuraminidases (NAs), EC 3.2.1.18, unifies exo-sialidases cleaving the glycosidic bonds of terminal sialic acids from carbohydrates, glycolipids, or glycoproteins

  • We find the non-influenza virus NA (iNA) to be more closely related to one another than to iNAs, which is in agreement with systematic sequence studies of glycoside hydrolases (GH) families (Davies & Henrissat, 1995)

  • We surmise that Q136 plays a role as connecting element in the structural communication between interface and active site. Besides this potential mechanism of propagation, we demonstrated the overall impact of the assembly state on the conformational sampling, by Principal component analysis (PCA) and the comparison of 2D-Root-mean square deviations (RMSDs)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The enzyme class of neuraminidases (NAs), EC 3.2.1.18, unifies exo-sialidases cleaving the glycosidic bonds of terminal sialic acids from carbohydrates, glycolipids, or glycoproteins. In the viral life cycle, iNA is responsible for cleaving mature virus particles from the host cell. This role is complementary to the function of the second antigenic surface structure, hemagglutinin, which binds to the sialic acid receptor on the host cell to trigger virus entry. INA destroys the hemagglutinin receptor and reduces the binding sites for the pathogen on the surface of a host cell Thereby, it facilitates the detachment of the mature virus from infected cells and prevents virus aggregation. Inhibition of iNA with zanamivir or oseltamivir limits infection rates, as the enzyme is essential for the spread of the virus

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.