Abstract
Content Centric Networking aspires to a more efficient use of the Internet through in-path caching, multi-homing, and provisions for state maintenance and intelligent forwarding at the CCN routers. However, these benefits of CCN’s communication model come at the cost of large Pending Interest Table (PIT) sizes and Interest traffic overhead. Reducing PIT size is essential since larger memory sizes have an associated cost of slower access speeds, which would become a bottleneck in high speed networks. Similarly, Interest traffic may lead to upload capacity getting filled up which would be inefficient as well as problematic in case of traffics having bidirectional data transfers such as video conferencing. Our contribution in this paper is threefold. Firstly, we reduce PIT size by eliminating the need for maintaining PIT entries at all routers. We include the return path in the packets and maintain PIT entries at the egress routers only. Further, we use Persistent Interests (PIs), where one Interest suffices for retrieving multiple data segments, in order to reduce PIT entries at the egress routers as well as to reduce Interest overhead. This is especially useful for live and interactive traffic types where packet sizes are small leading to a large number of pipelined Interests at any given time. Lastly, since using PIs affects CCN’s original transport model, we address the affected aspects, namely congestion and flow control and multi path content retrieval. For our congestion scheme, we show that it achieves max-min fairness.
Highlights
Content Centric Networking aims for a more efficient use of the Internet
We focused on Pending Interest Table (PIT) size reduction
For this purpose we proposed maintaining the return path inside the packets so as to eliminate the need for PIT in non egress routers
Summary
Content Centric Networking aims for a more efficient use of the Internet. It follows a pull based communication model the content is split into multiple segments and the subscriber sends out a separate Interest packet for each segment. Unlike the current Internet, routing is based on content names as opposed to end hosts’ IP addresses. The approach followed by Content Centric Networks (CCNs) has many benefits – in-path caching, multi-homing, and provisions for state maintenance and intelligent forwarding at the CCN routers, to name a few. CCN does have a problem of a large memory footprint and overhead traffic that needs to be addressed to get the maximum benefit from CCN’s pull based communication
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.