Abstract

In Brief OBJECTIVE To determine whether a short interdelivery interval is associated with decreased rate of successful vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC). METHODS A retrospective cohort study from January 1, 1997, to December 31, 2000, was conducted. Patients with previous cesarean delivery who attempted VBAC were identified. The analysis was limited to patients at term with one prior cesarean. The interdelivery interval was calculated in months between the index pregnancy and prior cesarean delivery. RESULTS A total of 1516 subjects who attempted VBAC were identified among 24,162 deliveries, with complete data available in 1185 cases. The VBAC success rate was 79.0% for patients with an interdelivery interval less than 19 months compared with 85.5% for patients with an interval delivery greater than or equal to 19 months (P = .12). For patients whose labors were induced, interdelivery intervals of less than 19 months were associated with a decreased rate of VBAC success when compared with longer intervals (P < .01). Sufficient power (β = .95) existed to detect a 64% difference between the groups (α = .05). No significant difference was detected in women who underwent spontaneous labor (P = .98). There was no difference in the rate of symptomatic uterine rupture (P = 1.00). CONCLUSION Interdelivery intervals of less than 19 months were associated with a decreased rate of VBAC success in patients who underwent induction, a difference not found in those with spontaneous labor. In patients who undergo labor induction, a shorter interdelivery interval is associated with a decreased rate of success for vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.