Abstract
Abstract The analysis of intercultural communication, which is adopted in mainstream applied linguistics and communication studies, aims to explain the meaning of cultural differences and identities in the present global world. The present analysis of intercultural communication is based on theories of cultural variability, which highlight the basic distinctions between values determining cultural differences and identities. Some studies in applied linguistics observe cultural variability as a discursive construction based on a form of epistemological essentialism, produced in the Western part of the world to give meaning to its hegemony. However, these studies share some epistemological foundations with theories of cultural variability. This paper proposes a theorization of intercultural communication, which explains cultural differences and identities as constructed in communication systems and based on their particular structural presuppositions. In this perspective, the hegemonic structure of intercultural communication is ethnocentrism, including the presuppositions of Us/Them basic distinction, positioning of individuals as members of cultural groups and normative expectations about displays of We-identities. This theorisation also provides an explanation of the discursive construction of new hybrid forms of identity, which are observed as a result of globalisation, and of the interdependence between local and global communication systems. Finally, this theorization leads to explain the meaning of intercultural dialogue, which is presented as an alternative to ethnocentrism. The open question regards the explanation of dialogue as either a new discursive construction of hegemonic Western culture or a new structure, introducing equality in participation, sensitivity for participants’ personal expressions and expectations of participants’ empowerment in local and global communication systems.
Highlights
The analysis of intercultural communication, which is adopted in mainstream applied linguistics and communication studies, originates from theories of cultural variability
The paper analyses some studies in applied linguistics that observe cultural variability as a discursive construction, but that do not challenge the assumption of individuals as authors and actors of their cultural identities
Starting from these studies, the paper suggests a theory of intercultural communication systems, which can explain the discursive construction of cultural variability as a consequence of the structure of ethnocentrism
Summary
The analysis of intercultural communication, which is adopted in mainstream applied linguistics and communication studies, originates from theories of cultural variability These theories see intercultural communication as based on a variety of cultural forms, and identify this variety of forms as the salient aspect of globalisation and multicultural societies. The paper analyses some studies in applied linguistics that observe cultural variability as a discursive construction, but that do not challenge the assumption of individuals as authors and actors of their cultural identities Starting from these studies, the paper suggests a theory of intercultural communication systems, which can explain the discursive construction of cultural variability as a consequence of the structure of ethnocentrism. It analyses the meaning of dialogue as a possible alternative to ethnocentrism
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
