Abstract

An intercomparison of in‐situ OH measurements by differential optical absorption spectroscopy (DOAS) and laser‐induced fluorescence spectroscopy (LIF) was carried out in August 1994 in a clean rural environment in North‐East Germany. A large data set of temporally overlapping OH measurements with well defined measurement errors was obtained and compared. Both instruments encountered the same air masses, except when the wind came from NNW and caused a perturbation of the DOAS measurements. Excluding that wind sector, the weighted regression analysis of 137 data pairs (70% of all available data pairs) yields a linear relationship between the DOAS and LIF measurements with a correlation coefficientr = 0.90. The unity slope (1.01±0.04) and the non‐significant intercept (0.28±0.15) × 106 cm−3 demonstrate that both OH instruments agreed excellently in their calibrations and accurately measured OH.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call