Abstract

This paper assesses the performance of water vapor measurements by Sondeur Atmospherique du Profild’ Humidite Intertropicale par Radiometrie (SAPHIR), microwave limb sounder (MLS), and the global reanalysis water vapor data [Modern Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA) and European Center for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts reanalysis (ERA) interim] by comparing with water vapor-measured in situ by cryogenic frost-point hygrometer (CFH) at two tropical stations, Trivandrum (8.5°N, 76.9°E) and Hyderabad (17.47°N, 78.58°E). The iMet-1 radiosonde though overestimates frost-point temperature (3%–5%) in the 4–10-km altitude region with respect to CFH, it agrees well with CFH observations in the upper troposphere and the lower troposphere with a mean difference <2% and ~1%, respectively. SAPHIR–CFH intercomparison is done for the troposphere region, and MLS, MERRA, and ERA interim are compared with CFH in the lower stratosphere region. SAPHIR and CFH comparison shows a reasonable agreement between both the datasets with a relative humidity difference of about 15% in the lower and middle troposphere and a dry bias of ~40% in the upper troposphere. Intercomparison between CFH and MLS water vapor mixing ratios (WVMRs) shows a small wet bias (−10% to −20%) for the MLS in the lower stratospheric region between 100 and 50 hPa and a small dry bias (<10%) above that region. This paper shows that the MLS always underestimates when the CFH WVMR is greater than 6 ppmv and overestimates when the WVMR is less than 2 ppmv. The intercomparison of CFH with MERRA and ERA interim specific humidity shows results similar to that with MLS.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call