Abstract

The rapid development of remote sensing technology has promoted the generation of different vegetation index products, resulting in substantive accomplishment in comprehensive economic development and monitoring of natural environmental changes. The results of scientific experiments based on various vegetation index products are also different with the variation of time and space. In this work, the consistency characteristics among three global normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) products, namely, GIMMS3g NDVI, MOD13A3 NDVI, and SPOT-VGT NDVI, are intercompared and validated based on Landsat 8 NDVI at biome and regional scale over the Mongolian Plateau (MP) from 2000 to 2014 by decomposing time series datasets. The agreement coefficient (AC) and statistical scores such as Pearson correlation coefficient, root mean square error (RMSE), mean bias error (MBE), and standard deviation (STD) are used to evaluate the consistency between three NDVI datasets. Intercomparison results reveal that GIMMS3g NDVI has the highest values basically over the MP, while SPOT-VGT NDVI has the lowest values. The spatial distribution of AC values between various NDVI products indicates that the three NDVI datasets are highly consistent with each other in the northern regions of the MP, and MOD13A3 NDVI and SPOT-VGT NDVI have better consistency in expressing vegetation cover and change trends due to the highest proportions of pixels with AC values greater than 0.6. However, the trend components of decomposed NDVI sequences show that SPOT-VGT NDVI values are about 0.02 lower than the other two datasets in the whole variation periods. The zonal characteristics show that GIMMS3g NDVI in January 2013 is significantly higher than those of the other two datasets. However, in July 2013, the three datasets are remarkably consistent because of the greater vegetation coverage. Consistency validation results show that values of SPOT-VGT NDVI agree more with Landsat 8 NDVI than GIMMS3g NDVI and MOD13A3 NDVI, and the consistencies in the northeast of the MP are higher than northwest regions.

Highlights

  • Vegetation is a crucial component of the terrestrial surface system, which plays a vital role as a regulator in global and regional biochemical cycle, water and energy balance, and climate change [1,2,3]

  • The agreement coefficient (AC) values between MOD13A3 normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and SPOT-VGT NDVI are higher than the other NDVI data combinations, which indicates that MOD13A3 NDVI and SPOT-VGT NDVI have better agreement in expressing vegetation cover and change trends in the Mongolian Plateau (MP) from February 2000 to May 2014

  • This study aimed for intercomparison of three global NDVI products, namely, GIMMS3g NDVI, MOD13A3 NDVI, and SPOT-VGT NDVI over the MP from February 2000 to May 2014

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Vegetation is a crucial component of the terrestrial surface system, which plays a vital role as a regulator in global and regional biochemical cycle, water and energy balance, and climate change [1,2,3]. After nearly 40 years of development, more than 40 vegetation indices have been defined [6] and have been widely used in modeling and monitoring global and regional climate change [1,7,8,9,10,11,12], identifying vegetation phenology [13,14,15,16,17,18,19], investigating the desert boundaries [20], detecting desertification changes [21], classifying and surveying land use/land cover [22,23,24,25,26], and assessing natural disasters such as drought and fire risk [3,27,28,29,30]. The enhanced vegetation index (EVI) and the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) are both effective VIs and are widely applied in providing consistent spatial and temporal information regarding global vegetation. EVI provides improved sensitivity in high biomass regions while minimizing soil and atmosphere influences, which is superior to NDVI in characterizing surface vegetation in areas with high vegetation coverage. Refs. [33,34], while serious oversaturation in areas with high vegetation cover is the biggest limitation of NDVI [35]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call