Abstract
Substantial interjudge differences in stuttering-event counts have been repeatedly demonstrated in previous research. Kully and Boberg (1988) suggested the possibility of interclinic differences as well, but their study was not designed to distinguish interclinic differences from interjudge differences. The present study demonstrates both interclinic and interjudge disagreements in relatively experienced judges' identifications of stuttering events.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
