Abstract

This study assessed the interchangeability between heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV) measures derived from a series of interbeat intervals (IBIs) recorded via electrocardiogram (ECG) and intra-arterial blood pressure (BP) in various behavioral contexts. Five minutes of simultaneously recorded IBIs from ECG and BP signals in 11 female domestic pigs during resting, feeding, and active behavior were analyzed. Comparisons were made for measures of HR, the standard deviation of IBIs, and the root mean of the squared distances of subsequent IBIs derived from ECG and BP signals for each behavior category using statistical procedures with different explanatory power [linear regression, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Bland and Altman plots, and analysis of variance (ANOVA)]. Linear regression showed a strong relationship for HR during all behaviors and for HRV during resting. Excellent ICCs [lower 95% confidence intervals (CI) >0.75] and narrow limits of agreement in all behavior categories were found for HR. ICCs for HRV reached the critical lower 95% CI value of 0.75 only during resting. Using Bland and Altman plots, HRV agreement was unacceptable for all of the behavior categories. ANOVA showed significant differences between the methods in terms of HRV. BP systematically overestimated HRV compared with ECG. Our findings reveal that HR data recorded via BP agree well those recorded using ECG independently of the activity of the subject, whereas ECG and BP cannot be used interchangeably in the context of HRV in free-moving domestic pigs.

Highlights

  • Fluctuations between heartbeats in mammals are predominantly regulated by the constant interplay between the parasympathetic and sympathetic branches of the autonomic nervous system (ANS)

  • Parameters of heart rate variability (HRV) derived from cardiac interbeat interval (IBI) data provide information regarding the complex interaction between both branches (SDNN: the standard deviation of all interbeat intervals (IBIs) of the data set) and regarding parasympathetic activation alone (RMSSD: the square root of the mean of the sum of the squares of differences between successive IBIs) [3]

  • Regarding heart rate (HR), we found a mean difference of 0.26 bpm, and 95% of the differences lay between −0.37 and 0.89 bpm (LoA)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Fluctuations between heartbeats in mammals are predominantly regulated by the constant interplay between the parasympathetic and sympathetic branches of the autonomic nervous system (ANS). The assessment of heart rate variability (HRV) is widely used as an indicator of autonomic function in the analysis of physiological signals in humans and animals [1,2,3]. The mean heart rate (HR) can be interpreted as a reflection of the net effects of the interaction between both branches of the ANS. Parameters of HRV derived from cardiac interbeat interval (IBI) data provide information regarding the complex interaction between both branches (SDNN: the standard deviation of all IBIs of the data set) and regarding parasympathetic activation alone (RMSSD: the square root of the mean of the sum of the squares of differences between successive IBIs) [3]. Within the field of farm animal research, analyses of HRV have been used to investigate changes in sympathovagal balance due to pathology [6], stress [7, 8], housing and management conditions [9, 10], learning [11], pain [12, 13], and emotional states [14, 15]

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call