Abstract

The binding of phenanthridine dyes to triplex poly(dT)∗poly(dA)·poly(dT) and its precursor duplex poly(dA)·poly(dT) is characterized using linear dichroism and circular dichroism spectroscopy, and thermal denaturation. The two monomeric dyes ethidium bromide and propidium iodide are shown to behave similarly to each other in intercalating into and stabilizing both the duplex and the triplex structures. However, contrary to expectations, the extra cationic side-chain of propidium iodide provides no significant extra stabilization of triplex compared with ethidium bromide, although propidium does stabilize the duplex more than ethidium. The monomeric dyes appear to have somewhat different binding geometries with the duplex and triplex polymers. The dimeric dye ethidium homodimer is found to bis-intercalate in the triplex as well as the duplex but, in contrast to the monomers, no variation in geometry between duplex and triplex is observed. However, although dimer stabilizes the duplex, it has no effect on the thermal stability of the triplex. This lack of binding preferentiality of the dimer for triplex compared with the monomeric dyes indicates greater constraints on the accommodation of a bis-intercalator in the triplex structure than in the duplex.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.