Abstract

In many situations, decision-making behaviors are mostly composed of team patterns (i.e., more than two persons). However, brain-based models that inform how team interactions contribute and impact team collaborative decision-making (TCDM) behavior, is lacking. To examine the neural substrates activated during TCDM in realistic, interpersonal interaction contexts, dyads were asked to model TCDM toward their opponent, in a multi-person prisoner’s dilemma game, while neural activity was measured using functional near infrared spectroscopy. These experiments resulted in two main findings. First, there are different neural substrates between TCDM and ISDM, which were modulated by social environmental cues. i.e., the low incentive reward yielded higher activation within the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), in individual separately decision-making (ISDM) stage while the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and the middle frontopolar area was activated in TCDM stage. The high incentive reward evoked a higher interbrain synchrony (IBS) value in the right IFG in TCDM stage. Second, males showed higher activation in the DLPFC and the middle frontopolar area during ISDM, while females evoked higher IBS in the right IFG during TCDM. These sex effects suggest that in individual social dilemma situations, males and females may separately depend on non-social and social cognitive ability to make decisions, while in the social interaction situations of TCDM, females may depend on both social and non-social cognitive abilities. This study provide a compelling basis and interesting perspective for future neuroscience work of TCDM behaviors.

Highlights

  • Cooperation refers to the behavior/intention of individuals or groups to collaborative in order to achieve a common goal and to promote an outcome that is both beneficial to themselves and to others (Decety et al, 2004)

  • Interbrain Synchrony of Team Decision-Making deliberated and resolved through team/group patterns where most of the decisions are made by more than two people. This type of decision has been defined as team/group collaborative decision-making (TCDM) (Bahrami et al, 2010), the goals of TCDM and JDM are to obtain the benefit of cooperation, TCDM does not have contradictions between individual interests and team interests, while in JDM behavior, individuals may give up cooperation within the team in order to pursue a higher payoff

  • There was an interaction between sex and decision-type [F(1, FIGURE 3 | Intra-brain activation in individual separately decision-making (ISDM) stage. (A–D) Higher activations in the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) (LIR condition vs. HIR condition). (A) The 2D model of activation map of the left IFG; (B) front, (C) right, and (D) left view of a 3D model of activation map of the left IFG. (E,F) Higher activations in the dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and the middle frontopolar area of males (LIR condition vs. HIR condition, when male dyads made defection decision). (G,H) Higher activations in the DLPFC and the middle frontopolar area of males

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Cooperation refers to the behavior/intention of individuals or groups to collaborative in order to achieve a common goal and to promote an outcome that is both beneficial to themselves and to others (Decety et al, 2004). With the development of the hyperscanning technique, the research tendency of cooperative behavior has shifted from experimental single-brain, to a natural multi-brain framework (Hasson et al, 2012; Schilbach et al, 2013) These studies have revealed increased synchronized activity in the right superior frontal cortices and the medial prefrontal region when performing joint actions (Funane et al, 2011; Cui et al, 2012; Dommer et al, 2012), the right temporo-parietal junction (TPJ) during face to face economic cooperation (Tang et al, 2016), and anterior cingulate cortex and prefrontal areas synchrony, between brains of dyad teams playing the prisoner’s dilemma game (PDG) (Astolfi et al, 2011). H3: male and female participants may exhibit different neural patterns during ISDM and TCDM processes

Participants
Experimental Procedure
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
ETHICS STATEMENT
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call